[table id=6 /]
[table id=1 /]
Are there any black people mentioned in the Bible? The answer is yes. However, the Christian site “Got Questions?” got this answer completely wrong (click here to read their original response to this question). Their entire response is uninformed and continues the cycle of denying what scripture actually says. I’m going to quote and highlight everything they got wrong, and then I’ll explain why it’s wrong.
It is both intellectually dishonest and scripturally inaccurate to claim that Ham is the father of the black nations, and then attempt to explain away every descendant of Ham as anything other than black. It doesn’t work both ways.
With that said, this rebuttal isn’t about bashing or condemnation, but about correction and education.
Black People Mentioned In The Bible
“We can say with a fair degree of certainty that, yes, the Bible does mention black people, although the Bible does not explicitly identify any person as being black-skinned. Neither does the Bible specifically identify any person as being white-skinned. A person’s skin color is rarely mentioned in the Bible; the color of one’s skin is meaningless to the basic message of the Bible.” – Got Questions.org
- Kedar: Named so based solely on his skin color. His name means “dark skinned”, which makes sense because he was 3/4 African.
- Moses: Mistaken for an Egyptian, which we know descended from Hamites in Africa. Egyptians depicted themselves as black people.
- Song of Solomon: The woman writer identifies herself as having black skin twice.
- Paul: Mistaken for an Egyptian just like Moses.
- Niger: An apostle mentioned in Acts. His name literally means “black skin”.
These are just a few examples, and there are many more. All of these references can be found all over this site, which is dedicated to that exact subject. The following image shows black Arabs, which are very rarely shown in the media or even mentioned in most Bible studies. These same black Arabs also claim to be Kedarites (descendants of Abraham’s grandson Kedar).
- Hebrews Had Dark Skin: Evidence In The Old and New Testaments
- The Meaning of Ruddy: Reddish Brown Skin Tones In The Bible
The Middle East Was Originally Black (Hamite & Hebrew)
Once again, Got Questions delivers a highly inaccurate response. Let’s take a look at what they have to say, and then we’ll take a look at actual history:
“The vast majority of the Bible’s narrative takes place in the Middle East, in and around Israel. Neither “black” nor “white” people are common in these regions. The majority of people in the Bible are Semitic and would have been light to dark brown in complexion. Ultimately, it does not matter what skin color the people in the Bible had.” – Got Questions.org
Israel shares a border with Egypt, which is located in Africa. Egypt is the Hebrew word Mizraim, and he was a descendant of Ham. We know that the Hebrews spent 400 years in Africa, and also intermarried with Africans throughout scripture. To say that there were mostly Middle Eastern People in the area is simply not true.
“A few authorities hold that in the reign of Isis the surplus population of Egypt was evacuated to neighboring lands under the leadership of Hierosolymus and Judas. Many assure us that the Jews are descended from those Ethiopians who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king.” – Tacitus, Histories 5.2 (110 A.D.)
Why is it that during the first century after the death of Christ, people thought the Jews were either Ethiopian or Egyptian? Both of which are black descendants from the lineage Ham. If the Hebrews were white, light, or “Middle Eastern”, they would not have been rumored to be from different parts of Africa.
The Myth of a White Egypt
The myth of a white Egypt is heavily presented in most Christian churches, in order to avoid admitting that Egypt was a black African empire that intermarried into the Hebrew tribes. Here are two videos that confirm that Egypt was a black nation before Greek, Roman, and other invasions:
Hamites Settled The Middle East
- Nimrod – He was a Cushite from the lineage of Ham. He founded Babylon and several other nations in The Middle East. Cushites are historically known for their black skin. Nimrod was no exception.
- Asshur – His descendants were known as the Assyrians. He was from Nimrod’s Cushite empire and he founded Nineveh.
The Majority Were Not Semetic (Shemites)
We can see on the map that it was the descendants of Ham that settled the majority of locations that are significant to scripture. According to Genesis 10, it was Nimrod that established the earliest and largest Middle Eastern empire. Nimrod was one of the first Cushites born to Ham’s son Cush.
Downplaying Black People In The Bible
Far too often, the role of black people in the Bible is downplayed or explained away as something other than what it is. This has been done in art and by people that teach the Bible. Black people are not given credit for much of what can only be attributed to black people.
Moses and Zipporah
Zipporah Was Not A Cushite
Here we find a huge error due to lack of research. Zipporah is a Midianite descendant of Abraham and his third wife Keturah (Exodus 2:15-22). Since Midianites descend from Abraham and Cushites descend from Ham, there is no way Zipporah was a Cushite. Moses took a second wife and she was black.
I find it odd that they don’t mention that Cush was descended from Ham. We have to wonder if that was an oversight or intentional, but we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. As mentioned before, Cushites were known for their black skin. It wasn’t just an area. It was an entire lineage of African people.
King Solomon’s Black Lover
Bathsheba The Gilonite
The Queen of Sheba
Sheba is known today as Ethiopia, and they were Cushites. They were descendants of Ham’s son Cush, and well known for their dark skin. There’s no reason to “believe” a person from Africa was black back then. We know they were black for a fact.
Simon of Cyrene
Cyrene is located in Libya (Africa), which is a pretty strong indication that he was black. The founding of Libya can be traced back to Ham’s son Phut. The following quote isn’t a matter of disagreement, but it could’ve been taken a little bit further:
Ethiopians and Hebrews
“The Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8:37 was almost certainly black. Ethiopians are mentioned about 40 times in the Bible, and we can assume that these are references to black people, since Ethiopians are black. The prophet Jeremiah asked, “Can the Ethiopian change his skin?” (Jeremiah 13:23)—the natural assumption is that Jeremiah refers to black skin.”
For starters, they are correct when they say that Ethiopia and it’s inhabitants are mentioned 40 times in the Bible. Here are those references:
The above picture shows the same style of oven that would’ve been used in Jeremiah’s time. We can see that the oven is black. Not brown or tanned or any other words that avoid using the description of black. We also know that white people do not turn black. The same holds true with most light skinned people. Black people get darker and lighter based on how long they are in the sun.
“Most Bible teachers believe that black people are descendants of Noah’s son Ham (Genesis 10:6–20), but we cannot be sure since the Bible does not specifically say. When it comes to skin color, the Bible is consistently silent. The color of the skin is not as important to God as the condition of the heart. The gospel is universal good news. Black people, white people, and every shade in between are invited to come to Christ for salvation. By the grace of God we can take our eyes off of the skin and focus on the soul.” – Got Questions.org
- Depictions and descriptions of Biblical people were changed from black to white during the Renaissance Period.
- We are constantly shown images of The Middle East and Egypt post European invasion and not based on the actual history of how Egyptians depicted themselves. .
- British-Israelism and Christian Identity teach that whites are the true Israel, which isn’t based on anything other than their own need to feel superior to everyone else.
- The false teaching of Ham being “cursed” with black skin is ever present in churches, even though the Bible doesn’t mention black skin, nor was Ham the one cursed..
- The false teaching that Cain was cursed with black skin is a huge issue in church.
If skin color truly didn’t matter, they wouldn’t have changed the way Hebrews were depicted or described in the first place. The following picture is the oldest know picture of Christ and the disciples in existence. The picture is located in The Coptic Museum in Cairo, Egypt… and yet we still see more modern pics of white Renaissance Jesus, and never this one.
The response over at Got Questions.org needs a drastic update or at the very minimum it needs to add a link to sites like this one if their actual intent is to provide truthful answers. This is also why it is important for us to share this type of information because it’s simply not being taught in its entirety. Only by spreading knowledge can we hope to counter the misinformation being pushed all over the internet and in most churches.
[otw_shortcode_button href=”https://www.patreon.com/dantefortson” size=”large” bgcolor=”#f96854″ icon_position=”left” shape=”radius” target=”_blank”]Click Here For Access To Exclusive BHITB Studies, Downloads, & More[/otw_shortcode_button]
[table id=2 /]
[table id=10 /]
[table id=7 /]