---

[table id=6 /]

---

[table id=1 /]

There is no bigger threat to white supremacy than the notion that Jesus of Nazareth was a black man. White supremacy can’t exist in a world where the savior of all mankind is the same hue as the people they’ve enslaved, murdered, beat, raped, and oppressed for 400 years. The very thought of bowing and worshiping a black man, Messiah or not, is anathema to Eurocentric Christianity… but how far would they go to keep the world from acknowledging the truth about the greatest event in the history of mankind?

A Little Bit of Background

There are several things in the Bible that never made sense to me from a basic reading of scripture. The unwillingness of the world to repent and turn to God, even after all of the destruction laid out in the book of Revelation, seems defiant beyond comprehension. But the more time I spent associating with white conservative Christians, the more I realized that race is more of an issue than they would like us to believe. As soon I started looking into the historical, cultural, and racial origins of the Hebrews, the hatred began to manifest.

• I’ve received multiple messages telling me not to go down this path of research.
• I’ve received multiple messages claiming that researching this subject “isn’t of God.”
• I’ve receive d multiple messages claiming that God would never choose black people as his nation.
• I’ve been accused of being a racist who only says Jesus is black so I can “feel special”.

I’ve been sharing my nephilim research online since the late 90s and the more up to date stuff since 2009. Conservative fringe Christians loved my research until around 2015. Suddenly the same research methods that they praised for my book As The Days of Noah Were: The Sons of God and The Coming Apocalypse, were hated now that it led to a conclusion they didn’t want to accept… Christ and the Hebrews were black. Here are a few other quick facts that many people don’t know:

• This site was originally started specifically to share my research into the lineage of Ham and any other information I discovered about the presence of black people in the Bible.
• It wasn’t until my research into the line of Ham began crossing into the line of Shem that I started to look closer at the claims that Hebrews were black.
• It took me a few months of study before I took an official stance on the ethnicity of true Israel being black, and even longer before I accepted that they were enslaved here in America.

From 2016 – present many people have asked, “what difference does it make?” That’s a valid question that many people have, and while it shouldn’t make a difference, it definitely does. After giving that question a lot of thought, I’ve come to the conclusion that it will matter more than we may know in the not too distant future.

• Europeans seem to believe that they can steal other people’s culture whenever they want.
• Europeans seem to think nobody should call out their theft as exactly what it is.
• Europeans seem to think we care about any excuses they make after they’ve proven themselves to liars, thieves, murderers, rapists, etc… and I assume some of them are good people.

Their most common reaction to all of the above is, “why does it matter if we stole your history and repainted it white?” Yep… This is the world we live in. But let’s not put the cart in front of the horse. While many of us are convinced of a black Israel and black Christ, there are many that aren’t, so let’s start with our kinsman redeemer.

Christ Is Our Kinsman Redeemer

There will always be a back and forth on the subject no matter how much evidence gets dropped in the lap of most believers of all colors… any time this subject comes up, there is always someone out there that doesn’t want people who believe in the Bible seeking out certain subjects found within the Bible itself. Some of the subjects I’ve heard some Christians ask others to ignore include but aren’t limited to:

• Angels and Demons
• Ghosts and Poltergeists
• Nephilim Giants
• UFOs and Aliens
• Race In The Bible

People would rather believe made up fairy tales about the ethnicity and race of Christ than to seek out what the word of God says. Christ was a human man in every sense of the word (addressing his humanity not his deity).  All people alive and dead can relate to him in some way, but black people in America seem to have the most in common with him, now more than ever before.

1. He was born under oppressive conditions brought on by a European (Roman) controlled government (John 11:47-48).
2. He was falsely accused of a crime he didn’t commit and was illegally arrested based on false testimony (Luke 23:14).
3. He faced a rigged jury  that had already condemned him to the world, similar to what Conservative media outlets do to black victims of police brutality in America (Luke 23:17-21).
4. He was beaten by the Roman “police” for no other reason than they wanted to beat him, and not a single one of those officers was convicted for breaking the law (John 19:1-4).
5. He challenged the European controlled oppressive government and was publicly executed just like MLK, Malcom X, and many others after him (John 19:12).
6. He was snatched up in the middle of the night just like Emmett Till by a mob of men for the purpose of delivering street justice (John 18:1-13).
7. He was lynched and hung on a tree like many black slaves and innocent free black people were all throughout the history of America (Galatians 3:13).

If the point of coming as a black man was to understand our plight, then I’m thoroughly convinced that he can relate to what’s happening to black people today worldwide, because he lived it. All of the above circumstantial observations aren’t “proof” that he a black man, but what if we could prove it beyond a shadow that a black man is exactly what he was?

[fblike]

The Witnesses of The Black Messiah

First and foremost, I’m a Bible believer. This isn’t a secret. So as a Bible believer, I believe that the following verse is true, regardless of our personal beliefs, traditions, or opinions:

“But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.” – Matthew 18:16

One of the biggest arguments against this subject is that the Bible doesn’t describe Christ, the Hebrews, or reference skin color. None of these statements have any truth to them at all. We’re going to break down the internal (Biblical) and external (Historical) evidence that Jesus was indeed a black man that died for the salvation of mankind. It is this evidence, and possibly more to come, that I believe will ultimately lead to the final battle between a world based around white supremacy and their unwillingness to submit to the black messiah.

[fblike]

Witness #1 – Daniel The Prophet

Daniel is one of my favorite prophets and there is so much wisdom, history, and prophecy hidden in his short book, that I find myself reading it the most. The following verse has had my attention for a long time because I use to believe it may have been the angel Gabriel visiting Daniel, but the deeper I look, the more I believe it may have been Christ acting in the role of “restrainer”:

“Then I lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a certain man clothed in linen, whose loins were girded with fine gold of Uphaz: His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.” – Daniel 10:5-6

We’ll come right back to these verses.

Witness #2 – John The Prophet

Most of us are very aware of John’s description of Christ because John specifically names Christ as the subject. Here’s what John had to say about the appearance of Christ:

“And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.” – Revelation 1:13-15

We’ll come right back to these verses as well.

Two Eyewitness Accounts

Now let’s look at these verses side by side and I’ll bold the sections that each description has in common with the other one. Then we’ll dig into the Hebrew and Greek words and their meanings.

“Then I lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a certain man clothed in linen, whose loins were girded with fine gold of Uphaz: His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.” – Daniel 10:5-6

“And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.” – Revelation 1:13-15

There are too many similarities in their descriptions for it to be coincidence. The only possible explanations are that John actually saw the same “man” that Daniel saw or John just ripped off Daniel outright.

1. Daniel and John mention a “man”.
2. Daniel and John mention the golden girdle.
3. Daniel and John describe his eyes as fire.
4. Daniel and John describe his voice in a similar manner.
5. Daniel and John both describe his skin color as bronze.*

If John ripped off Daniel, then John can’t be trusted. But if John’s words are true, then he is confirming Daniel’s description of a bronze skinned Messiah. Before we address some of the other points of what makes these two descriptions so important, let’s address the issue of which word was really used…

Bronze vs. Brass Hands and Feet

There is a huge difference between bronze and brass. Here are a couple of pictures to give you a visual idea of just how huge the difference is.

Now that we’re clear on the differences in color between bronze (brown) and brass (yellowish), it’s time to check out the Hebrew and Greek words to see which ones the actual witnesses are comparing his skin color to.

• Daniel: nechosheth (Strong’s #5178) – Copper, Bronze
• John: chalkolibanon (Strong’s #5474) – orichalcum, a fine metal, or frankincense of a yellow color.*

While the Strong’s is 100% clear on Daniel’s usage of the word, when we read the exhaustive definitions of the Greek word that John used, we see it linked to all of the following metals as well:

• Bronze
• Copper
• Gold
• Silver
• Gold + Silver (alloy)
• Copper + Silver (alloy)

When we run into a problem like this, one of the things I like to do is check out some of the other Bible versions to see how the scholars involved translated the word. Here are some examples of how John’s word is translated:

• NIV: Bronze
• NLT: Bronze
• ESV: Bronze
• NASB: Bronze
• NET Bible: Bronze
• KJV 2000: Bronze

To be fair there are other versions that translate the word as brass, but nowhere near as many as those that translate it as bronze. With so many different possibilities as to what John meant, lets use some common sense. John was trying to describe what he saw in a way we can relate to:

• There are people that have bronze colored skin.
• There are ZERO people with brass colored skin.

Until we see a brass colored person walking around in real life, it’s hard to understand why many people refuse to acknowledge what the Bible is telling us. Here is a picture of actual bronze feet. Just by looking at them we can tell that bronze is the same color as many of the humans living on this planet.

British-Israelism has no choice but to deny the above and their black supporters that teach Christianity is the white man’s religion, don’t study enough to even know to look into it. If ignorance is bliss, then these two groups are definitely rolling in it… and it is this ignorance that tends to lead to the following argument.

But This Was Post Resurrection Christ

One of the biggest arguments against using John’s description in Revelation is that it’s “after the resurrection”. When this argument is made, its a sign of cognitive dissonance and not wanting to wake up and acknowledge the truth:

• Christ didn’t suddenly die and come back to life as a bronze skinned man after the resurrection.
• He hadn’t yet been crucified when Daniel saw him, which means he was bronze skinned long before Revelation.

And that last point brings us to the elephant in the room. Daniel described a “man” or someone similar to a man, that was most likely Christ, and that man had bronze skin. The fact that the description appears BEFORE the birth of Christ leads us to two possible conclusions:

1. Christ chose to appear with bronze skin even prior to his birth, death, and resurrection.
2. There is a very high ranked bronze skinned angel in heaven that looks similar to post resurrection Christ.

In the entire history of humanity, no person has ever been able to decide what race they’d be born as, except Christ. He was able to choose his lineage, family, mother, skin color, and more. Every single one of his choices was a conscious decision that led to him walking this planet as a black man for thirty-ish years.

• Christ was the FIRST unapologetically black man to ever exist.

Ezekiel also described multiple winged beings with bronze colored skin as well (Ezekiel 1:7). While they aren’t evidence of Christ’s skin color, it is another prophet mentioning bronze skin in heaven. This brings us to the 3rd witness. The genealogy through which Christ would come. Even when we dig back through the evidence in what people believed prior to the Renaissance Period, we find paintings of God’s black arms reaching down from heaven:

[fblike]

Witness #3 – Genealogy

Perhaps some of the biggest evidence comes in the form of genealogy. Just so we don’t get side tracked, I’m going to summarize these connections. Feel free to click any of the links on this page for a more in depth study on each person, place, etc.

Scholars of all races often agree that Ham was the originator of the black races in Africa. That being the case, it would mean that ALL of Ham’s children were black and so were their descendants. According to the Bible, Ham was the father of the following nations to name just a few:

• Canaanites (Canaan)
• Libyans (Phut)
• Egyptians (Mizraim)
• Cushites (Cush)

Any time we see any Hebrews mixing with any people from any of the above tribes, then we know that their children were definitely not European or light skinned. Here’s a list of key people in the line of Judah that mixed with Hamite women:

• Judah – had five kids with two different Canaanite women.
• David – stole Bathsheba the Canaanite from Uriah the Hittite (resulted in the birth of Solomon).*
• Solomon – had a fling with the Queen of Sheba (Cushites).

*Bathsheba was from the Canaanite tribe called the Gilonites. They are named as one of the tribes conquered by Moses and Joshua in Canaan. The Hittites were also known as “the sons of Heth”. Heth was a descendant of Canaan as well.

One of the most ironic things about this subject is that Eurocentric Christianity will readily attribute black Africans and Black Arabs to the lineage of Ham, but at the same time ignore the fact that mixing with the lineage of Ham would result in mixed black offspring. In order to really understand how embedded Hamite DNA is into the Hebrew line, we need to look at their interactions in Africa.

Suggested Reading

• Ham: The Origin of Black Africans and Black Arabs
• Tamar: The Canaanite Mother of Judah’s Son Pharez
• Bathsheba: King Solomon’s Canaanite Mother

Journey Into Africa

Please don’t message me with the unenlightened and unoriginal comment that the word “Africa” didn’t exist back then. If you know the location I’m referring to then it doesn’t matter whether or not that was the word they used to describe the location. Now that I got that out of the way, let’s talk about the Hebrews and their relationship with Africa.

• Journey #1: Abraham and Sarah went to Africa and Abraham gave pharaoh his wife.
• Journey #2: Joseph lived in Africa for most of his life.
• Journey #3: Jacob moved his entire family to Africa.
• Journey #4: Hebrews spent over 400 years living in Africa.
• Journey #5: Israel is located on the border of Egypt.
• Journey #6: Christ hid in Africa for at least 4 years of his life.*

Israel always defaulted to Africa during times of famine and war. If the Bible was a Eurocentric book, it would be reasonable to assume that they’d run to Europe to escape persecution at least once, but they don’t. Even though African locations are named over and over again, Eurocentric Christianity will not acknowledge or accept that these were black people… IN AFRICA!!!

We could dwell on the above points all day, but it’s the last point that is going to bring us to the fourth witness…

[table id=8 /]

Witness #4 – The Most High

Let’s look at the the birth of Christ from God’s perspective. There are people that want to kill the Messiah, and you can only send him to the east or to the west to hide:

• East: The people get lighter the further you go into Asia and Europe.
• West: The people get darker as you head into Africa.

In order to really understand why the above is so important, we need to also look at the map below. Israel shares a border with Africa. In fact, the term “Middle East” wasn’t even widely used until the mid 1800s. Before that it was known as North Eastern Africa or Arabia.

Israel is that red sliver on the map. While I don’t pretend to know the mind of God, I feel confident in saying that God wouldn’t tell a white family to take a white baby and go hide among black people in Africa. That would only make them more obvious and easier to find. You don’t hide a needle in a haystack… you hide a needle in a stack of needles to make it virtually impossible to find. It’s the small details throughout the Bible that add up to one large truth. So which scenario more likely?

• God hid a white skinned baby among bronze skinned people.
• God hid a brass skinned baby among bronze skinned people.
• God hid a bronze skinned baby among bronze skinned people.

The choice is obvious, but most of all it’s consistent with all of scripture.

The Consistency of It All

The thing I love about the Bible is that the more I study it, the more I find that it has a beautiful and intricate consistency. It’s subtle and yet still completely obvious the longer you study. So let’s look at quite a few consistencies concerning ethnicity.

1. Abraham’s Journey: He was called out of the Cushite (descendants of Ham) empire of Babel, lived among the Canaanites (descendants of Ham), lived among the Egyptians and had a child by his Egyptian concubine (Hagar), and bought land from the sons of Heth (descendants of Ham).
2. Joseph: Lived among Egyptians (descendants of Ham) and married an Egyptian woman. His sons Ephraim and Manasseh (tribes of Israel) were half African, and Jacob gave them the birthright. It’s also important to note that Joseph’s brothers didn’t recognize any difference between him and the Egyptians when they finally found him.
3. The 12 Sons of Jacob: Jacob had 12 sons and 1 daughter, and they all lived among Canaanites (descendants of Ham).
4. Judah: Lived in Canaan and had 5 sons by 2 different Canaanite (descendants of Ham) women. His half Canaanite son Pharez is the one through whom David would eventually be born.
5. The First 70 Hebrews: During the famine, the entire family was reunited with Joseph, which prompts a move into Egypt (Africa). The remained in Africa marrying and having kids, which means they would’ve had to find wives among the people where they lived… in Africa (descendants of Ham).
6. The Death of Jacob: Upon the death of Jacob, the Hebrews traveled into Canaan to bury Jacob in he cave he bought from the Hittites (sons of Heth). The Canaanites saw the group and wrongfully mistook them for Egyptians.
7. Moses: He was found by an African woman, adopted by an African woman, raised as the son of an African woman, trained in African wisdom, and was mistaken for an African when he helped the Midianite girls.
8. The Exodus: After leaving Africa, we find several interesting stories that appear in Moses’ writings. There’s a story of a Hebrew woman married to an Egyptian man. There’s also a story of Moses marrying an Ethiopian (Cushite descendant of Ham) woman, and God turning Miriam white for having a problem with it.
9. Joseph, Mary, and Christ: All sent to hide in Africa for at least 4 years until the death of Herod, which means that Christ spent part of his childhood growing up with African children. His parents were probably friends with lots of Africans as well (assumption).
10. Paul: After being arrested Paul was mistaken for an Egyptian that murdered a bunch of people. Tacitus the Roman historian also describes all of the Hebrews during Paul’s time as possibly being descendants of Egyptians or Ethiopians. Nobody has ever mistook a European for an Egyptian or an Ethiopian.

Notice that not once does the Bible mention the Hebrew descendants of Shem mixing with the Gentile (European) descendants of Japheth… because it never happens in scripture.

• The Bible is consistent in it’s description of the Hebrews as resembling people from the line of Ham.
• The Bible is consistent about the Hebrews’ constant presence in Africa (the land of Ham).
• The Hebrews in the Bible consistently mixed with descendants of Ham and the children became part of the nation of Israel.

The Bible is completely consistent in it’s description of Hebrews, descriptions of Christ, and Hebrew interaction with the descendants of Ham. Eurocentric Christianity often seeks to avoid or explain away verses like these in order to push their agenda, make themselves feel better, or whatever other excuses they come up with in order to justify embracing a false belief system founded on lies.

[fblike]

God Uses Sarcasm… A Lot

When we think of the Bible we don’t often think of irony and sarcasm, but there’s a lot of it in there. Here is an example of God being sarcastic:

“Produce your cause, saith the LORD; bring forth your strong reasons, saith the King of Jacob. Let them bring them forth, and shew us what shall happen: let them shew the former things, what they be, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare us things for to come. Shew the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together.” – Isaiah 41:21-23

This is pure God inspired sarcasm with a lot of mocking. God was trolling people long before trolling was a thing. God definitely knows none of the above is even remotely possible. One of the biggest pieces of circumstantial evidence (in my opinion) of a black Christ is irony. What would be more ironic than if an entire culture, religion, and belief system built on white supremacy turned out to be based in the worship of a black man? If you think I’m stretching it, then ask yourself the following questions:

• How many white conservative Christians would bow and worship a black man?
• How many would rather justify going to war with the black Messiah by claiming he’s the devil?

When Christ is revealed and he turns out to be black, it’ll set the world on fire (literally and figuratively). Some will repent and remain believers, but many white Christians will walk away from the faith, but there will also be many that will turn their anger toward God’s people. The revelation of a black Messiah is the ultimate blow to white supremacy and will not be tolerated. In my opinion, I believe that is what may be the driving force behind the event in Psalms.

I want to take this opportunity to go on a very important momentary detour.

[table id=1 /]

The Savior of All Mankind

While I do believe the Hebrews were and are black, and Christ is black, I do not believe salvation is based on race at all. This is something I’ve made 100% clear in my Statement of Faith. Unfortunately, people mostly of European background tend to instantly make all kinds of false accusations whenever the words “black” and “Christ” appear in the same sentence:

• It’s Divisive: If TRUTH is divisive it is only divisive to people that want to be divided simply because Christ is black… but even more to the point, Christ came to “cause division” (Luke 12:51). His words not mine.
• It’s Racist: Pointing out the factual ethnicity of the Messiah does not equate to racism, but lying and depicting him falsely as a white man is the very definition of racism. It’s an attempt to strip his personally chosen heritage and insert their own onto the creator.
• Salvation Isn’t Based On Color: All I’m saying is that he’s black. Seeing the word “black” associated with Christ suddenly makes a lot of white Christians feel excluded…  but ironically they believe a white Christ is somehow all inclusive. I understand that salvation isn’t based on color, nor do I teach that it is.
• His Race Doesn’t Matter: Anyone saying this is lying. We know they’re lying because they don’t stop and say that when they see a picture of white Christ. If there is even a discussion about him being black they want to let everyone know they they’re against it and don’t want to know the truth, nor do they want others to teach the truth. All truth matters… if it’s not OK to call Christ a white female lesbian because his gender and sexual orientation are important, then it’s not OK to depict him as a white man when we know he was not.
• He Was Brown Not Black: They only say this because they don’t want Christ to be black. They certainly won’t make that statement when white people post pictures of white Jesus, but they are very vocal about it during any discussion concerning Christ being black. They will accept a huge white lie over a little bit of black truth any day of the week (I keep saying it because it’s important).

The reason I stress the above is because I believe EVERYONE can be saved. I don’t like to cherry pick parts of the Bible I agree with while disregarding those that don’t. My Bible says the following:

Old Testament

“And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious.” – Isaiah 11:10

New Testament

“Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel…” – Ephesians 3:4-6

Suggested Reading

• Unmasking The Gentiles: The Greatest Deception on Earth – Part 1

[fblike]

Witness #5 – The Forbidden Books

Many Christ followers are under the false impression that the King James version of the Bible is “the Bible”, no other versions are reliable, and any book not appearing in canon AFTER 1611 isn’t scripture. It’s a ridiculous and unfounded argument, but I have a suspicion that there may be Eurocentric reasons behind the removal of the two books I’m going to mention, and likely more books than that.

“Then they fasted that day, and put on sackcloth, and cast ashes upon their heads, and rent their clothes, and laid open the book of the law, wherein the heathen had sought to paint the likeness of their images.”- 1 Maccabees 3:47-48

There’s no real reason that Maccabees shouldn’t appear in scripture. It appears in most Catholic Bibles and gives us clear insight as to what Hanukah is all about. I believe it may be due to the above text pointing out that there was a clear European plot to paint their own images into scripture… and that’s exactly what happened during the Renaissance Period (1300 – 1700). Not only did it happen then, it is still happening now through TV, movies, and modern art. Including these verses in “the Bible” would cause people to start looking at the art, and once they do the little white lie is uncovered layer by layer. This brings us to the next book:

“After a time, my son Mathusala took a wife for his son Lamech. She became pregnant by him, and brought forth a child, the flesh of which was as white as snow, and red as a rose; the hair of whose head was white like wool, and long; and whose eyes were beautiful. When he opened them, he illuminated all the house, like the sun; the whole house abounded with light. And when he was taken from the hand of the midwife, opening also his mouth, he spoke to the Lord of righteousness. Then Lamech his father was afraid of him; and flying away came to his own father Mathusala, and said, I have begotten a son, unlike to other children. He is not human; but, resembling the offspring of the angels of heaven, is of a different nature from ours, being altogether unlike to us.” – Book of Enoch 105:1-3

This entire section of text destroys any notion that the first humans were white. The white skin came as a complete shock to Lamech, which causes him to point out that Noah’s white skin didn’t look like any other HUMAN on the planet. In fact, Lamech specifically said “he is not human” and resembled the “offspring of the angels of heaven”.

• Europeans will not tolerate a book in the Bible that says the offspring of evil angels were white.
• Europeans will not tolerate a book in the Bible that says no humans on earth before the flood were white.
• Europeans will not tolerate any belief or religion that does not prop them up as the master race.

I haven’t researched every single book that was removed from scripture, but I suspect that the removal of many of these books may tie to the Psalms 83 conspiracy to hide Israel and make them forget who they are. Over time, these books remained unread or unknown by most people… and so the false image of a white Jesus has been able to endure for and permeate our society for centuries. While Enoch doesn’t directly prove that the Messiah was black, it does indicate that Christ was black. It is the words of John that point us in that direction:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.” – John 1:1-3

According to John, the Word (Christ) created all things. If that is true and God made man in his image (Genesis 1:26), and the book of Enoch testifies that white skin was an anomaly… the only conclusion we can draw is that a bronze skinned Christ created bronze skinned humans in his bronze skinned image and likeness. Again, it is only my opinion, but I believe that this is the reason that they don’t want these two books in the same place at the same time. It always points back to the reality of a black savior.

If you’re playing a massive game of “Hide The Hebrews”, you certainly don’t want paintings like those in the next section in the mainstream consciousness, you don’t want a book like Enoch in the mainstream consciousness, and you certainly don’t want Maccabees drawing attention to the conspiracy to repaint Biblical people and angels as white. We know that white supremacy is a myth birthed from a sense of inferiority. And nothing will make some Europeans feel more inferior than knowing that Christ chose to be a black man, which means he rejected being a white man.

Suggested Reading

• The Book of Enoch: Black Adam, Albino Noah, and The Image of God

[fblike]

Witness #6 – The Paintings

For those that are skeptical of the Bible in General, pointing to the Bible over and over again as evidence doesn’t mean much. They may give some credit to the genealogies, but overall if they don’t believe the book, they want evidence outside of the book. For me, the strongest non Biblical evidence resides in what was painted PRIOR to the European Renaissance before they took it upon themselves to repaint history and turn Hebrews, God, and the angels white.

Some of us have seen it and some haven’t, but this is the oldest known depiction of Christ and the disciples. It can be seen in the Coptic Museum located in Cairo, Egypt… and it’s not the only older painting to show Christ and the disciples as black men. There’s also the following painting of him washing the feet of the disciples:

Interestingly, there is a pre Renaissance Period painting of Moses, which shows bronze skinned Hebrews crossing the Red Sea, but what’s even more subtle are the bronze skinned arms reaching out from heaven:

These paintings are hard evidence that prior to the Renaissance Period people KNEW the Hebrews were black people, they KNEW the disciples and Christ were black people, and even depicted God with outstretched black arms. There was no speculation about it. Descriptions and depictions outside of the Bible remain consistent with what we find inside of the Bible.

[fblike]

Witness #7 – The Historian

One of the biggest arguments from white Christians when it comes to the paintings is that “people depict Christ in a way that relates to them.” It’s a fair and accurate statement, but it doesn’t make it the right or truthful thing to do. Christ had a skin color and so did all other Hebrews. Tacitus’ (58 AD – 120 AD) testimony is a huge blow for those that do not believe Christ was black because:

• Tacitus was a European (Roman) that testifies to a black Israel.
• Tacitus lived during the lifetime of Paul and within a couple decades of Christ.

Here is what Tacitus had to say when describing the Hebrews during the first century AD:

“A few authorities hold that in the reign of Isis the surplus population of Egypt was evacuated to neighboring lands under the leadership of Hierosolymus and Judas. Many assure us that the Jews are descended from those Ethiopians who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king.” – Tacitus, Histories 5.2 (110 A.D.)

We know that Egyptians are black Africans and so are Ethiopians. I’ve never met a single person that has mistaken a European for an Egyptian or Ethiopian. The reason the words of Tacitus are so important is because mainstream history quotes him as a valid reliable source. He is also of a different nationality, which kills any rebuttal that he may be attempting to change the ethnicity of the Hebrews to make them something he can relate to.

[fblike]

How Many Witnesses Do We Really Need?

Even though I’ve provided seven different types of witnesses that point to a black Christ, we can break all of this evidence down into two important witnesses:

• The Word (all evidence found within scripture)
• The World (all evidence found outside of scripture)

It’s rare that both the word and the world agree, but that’s exactly what we find when it comes to what Christ looked like before Europeans decided to repaint history during the Renaissance and into the modern age.

“For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.” – Romans 3:3-4

Common sense tells us that there is no way that Hebrews spent all that time living among descendants of Ham and constantly producing half African children only to end up with this guy:

This guy didn’t hide in Africa, doesn’t have bronze skin, and in no way represents any description of Christ other than the false teaching of Eurocentric Christian mythology. But if Satan show’s up as a white man claiming to be Christ and showing off miracles, those that don’t know the truth will be deceived… and it will be someone that looks like this guy that will lead Europeans to war against Christ.

When The Glass House Shatters

The reason I went through all of the above evidence is in order to make sure we’re all on the same page as we progress through this study. As more and more people take up this line of research, the harder it becomes to keep people convinced that the people in Israel now are actually Hebrews and that the white depictions of Jesus are accurate. Those that have invested their entire life practicing hate and racism will be devastated when the lie falls apart… and it’s only a matter of time before it falls apart. They will be confused, mad, and ready to fight and kill.

“Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.” – Matthew 24:9

Was Christ addressing his disciples as Hebrews or was he addressing them as Christian believers? This matters because if he was addressing them as Hebrews, then that message has racial implications. If he was addressing them as Christian believers, then there will come a time when white Christians will be rounded up in America, and that is something that we just don’t see in scripture.

The Breakdown – Part 1

Those of us heavily involved in this field of study are very much aware of the hatred that comes along with simply saying Christ is black. I can’t even begin to imagine the repercussions of offering definitive proof to the masses. But whatever they are, they’ll be huge. Eurocentric Christianity will ALWAYS choose a white lie over a black truth (important).

• We will NEVER see a conservative Christian film company cast a black man as Christ.
• We will NEVER hear a conservative Christian pastor point out all of the references to black skin in the Bible.
• We will NEVER hear a conservative Christian pastor preach a black Christ to a white audience.

[fblike]

[table id=1 /]

Falling Away From The Faith

Will the revelation of a black Messiah lead to the “falling away” from the faith, as prophesied in the Bible? There is a very high probability that concrete proof of the black origins of scripture, Hebrews, and the Messiah would cause a mass departure of Europeans from the Christian faith… and maybe even some people of color if we’re being honest. When presented with the facts, there will be a choice to make, but scripture is clear what that choice will be:

“Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.” – 2 Thessalonians 2:1-4

Now it’s time to ask one tough question:

• If Christ isn’t European…
• If Christ isn’t the guy in the renaissance paintings…
• If Christ isn’t the one on all of the crucifixes hanging in churches…

Who Is This Man?

If Christ is not white and we know he’s not white, then the white man in the paintings is NOT the man that died to save the sins of the world. This is a false god they’ve built to themselves because they’ve hated the real Christ and the fact that he chose to be black… and if this is the man / god/ image that is prevalent in the church, then it seems to fulfill the prophecy made about Hebrews worshiping false gods in the land of their captivity:

“And the LORD shall scatter you among the nations, and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen, whither the LORD shall lead you. And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men’s hands, wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell.” – Deuteronomy 4:27-28

“The LORD shall bring thee, and thy king which thou shalt set over thee, unto a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known; and there shalt thou serve other gods, wood and stone.” – Deuteronomy 28:36

Many people believe that the version of white Jesus that we’re use to seeing are depictions of Cesare Borgia based on some of the similarities between his personal portrait and some European depictions of white Jesus.

However, I don’t believe that is Borgia at all. What we MAY BE LOOKING AT is what Satan set out to do in the first place… be like The Most High.

What if… just a what if for you to consider… what if who we’ve been looking at all these years is the deceiver… Satan himself? It’s certainly within his power and capability, which is something we learn during the temptation of Christ. It’s also within his list of ambitions, which is something we learn in Isaiah… but again… just a what if:

“For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.” – Isaiah 14:13-14

If this was the only indication of Satan’s ambition, we could chalk it up to conspiracy or speculation, but there is another event in the Bible that confirms that this exact thing was and still is within his capability.

“And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.” – Luke 4:5-8

The “temptation of Christ” was called a temptation for a reason. Satan didn’t come to play games. He came to play for keeps. What’s interesting is the revelation that he was given the power to put people in positions of power if he chose to. Christ didn’t dispute his ability to do so, which indicates that Satan wasn’t lying or over exaggerating his power.

• How many world leaders in the past have accepted that offer?
• How many leaders in power now may have accepted that offer?
• How many mainstream white conservative preachers have accepted that offer?

Maybe none… maybe all… maybe a few… the truth is we don’t know and may never know, but there is clearly an agenda to pass off a false white Messiah.

[fblike]

The Man of Sin

Once the Man of Sin is revealed it will be a deception beyond anything we’ve ever imagined. All believers like to believe that they’d be able to easily spot deception, but it might not be that easy. In my book, As The Days of Noah Were, I speculated that the Man of Sin, known as the Antichrist to most, might have ties to “alien” disclosure and the long standing belief that the resurrection of Christ was done with alien technology.

For those that are unfamiliar with the topic, the belief that Christ was resurrected with alien technology is a real belief held by some in the UFO community. In fact, the very first time I ever read an in depth explanation of “The Rapture”, it was in a UFO magazine. What I’ve never speculated on in any of my writing until now, is the appearance that he might take. This was information that at the time didn’t seem important enough to look into, but now it seems to make more sense as to why people would follow The Man of Sin, knowing full well he’s coming.

So not only would the world be faced with the revelation of the black Hebrew origins of the Bible and a black Christ, but also with a European imposter that looks like the man most of the world believes to be the real Messiah.

“And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.” – 2 Thessalonians 2:6-12

Deception only works if there is a solid basis for that deception. The words above are a co-sign of what Christ said to the disciples during the Olivet Discourse when they asked about the signs for the end of the age.

“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” – Matthew 24:24

The coming deception won’t be easily recognizable to many people because the MAJORITY OF CHRISTIANS are white conservatives with no desire to acknowledge the truth about who Christ is, where he came from, or why he came as a black man. They are setting themselves and others up for a major deception.

[fblike]

Who Are The Very Elect In Scripture?

Mainstream Eurocentric Christianity teaches that the “elect” are Christian believers, but there are billions of Christians on this planet, and yet there will most certainly be a falling away. So there must be a different group or a subset that is being referred to in these verses. As I was studying I decided to dip into the Greek to find out what “elect” means and I found something very interesting:

Elect (Strong’s #1588): eklektos

•  chosen out, elect, choice, select, sometimes as a subset: of those chosen out by God for the rendering of special service to Him (of the Hebrew race, particular Hebrews, the Messiah, and the Christians).
• select; by implication, favorite — chosen, elect.
• to select, choose, also used as a substantive/noun – properly, selected (chosen from, out of), especially as a deeply personal choice – literally “chosen, out of a personal preference (intention).

The meaning that we’ve been missing is that the elect refers to the “chosen” or “selected” and not to the called. Let’s look at the following verse first and then I’ll come back to this.

“So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.” – Matthew 20:16

The elect are a special group separate from the called.

• All people are called to come to Christ
• Hebrews were personally chosen by Christ.

The point seems to be that the false Christ will deceive a huge number of believers, but not Hebrew believers… but why is that? The answer to this may be one that many people don’t want to hear… and it’s one of the many reasons that his skin color does matter.

Hebrews Will Not Be Deceived

I do not believe that Hebrews will be deceived by the arrival of the false Messiah, because once we are awakened to the truth that Christ is not white, it is nearly impossible to convince us to go back to believing in any white man as the true Messiah. On the other hand, many white conservative believers will not even look at any evidence that remotely suggests that Christ was black, and will willingly continue in their deception and teach it to others:

• Many white Christians are waiting for a white Christ to return.
• Many white Christians will be deceived if a white Christ figure comes on the scene.
• Many white Christians will see the false white Christ (Antichrist) as proof that actual Christ was white.

Knowing who is who in the Bible may be the only defense we have against the coming deception, in whatever form it takes. We know that we should expect a fake Christ that will be so convincing that he’ll deceive everyone except the chosen people.

[fblike]

The Breakdown

This study isn’t about labeling all white believers as good or bad based on race. This study isn’t about saying salvation is connected to race in any way, shape, or form. These are just the cold hard facts of white conservative Christianity vs the cold hard truths of the Bible. Believers of color are more open to looking at the possibility that most of what we thought we knew about the Bible was wrong, but the same can’t be said for the majority of white conservative Christians.

A war is coming between God, Europe, and all that oppose the Messiah. We’re going to cover this and much more in depth as this study is updated. Make sure you like, share, comment, and subscribe so you don’t miss what’s to come (make sure you click the confirmation link in your email or you won’t get the notification).

“The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the Gentiles is on his way; he is gone forth from his place to make thy land desolate; and thy cities shall be laid waste, without an inhabitant.” – Jeremiah 4:7

What Are Your Thoughts?

• Will conservative Christians accept a black Messiah?
• Will the false Christ appear as the commonly depicted version of white Jesus?
• Why are white conservative so opposed to investigating if Christ was black?
• Will some European Christians fail to recognize the true Messiah and follow the false messiah?

Please Take A Moment To Share

If you enjoyed this study, please take a moment to click the button below and share it. Thanks in advance.

[fblike]

---

[table id=2 /]

---

[table id=10 /]

[table id=7 /]